Peer Review Process

Manuscripts submitted to the International Conference on Education, Economics, Law, and Technology (ICEELT) proceedings will undergo a peer review process involving at least two reviewers with relevant expertise in the subject area of the paper. All submissions are subject to a rigorous evaluation by qualified experts in the corresponding field.

The review process follows a double-blind peer review model, in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other in order to ensure objectivity, integrity, and the quality of the scholarly assessment.

The main criteria considered during the review process include relevance to the conference theme, scientific quality, research contribution and significance, originality, methodological soundness, clarity of analysis, readability, and language quality.

Accepted manuscripts will be published online after successfully completing all stages of the peer review and editorial process. The language used in this proceedings is English.

The possible editorial decisions include: acceptance without revision, acceptance with revisions, or rejection. If authors are requested to revise and resubmit their manuscripts, this does not guarantee that the revised version will be accepted for publication. Rejected manuscripts will not be reconsidered for further review.

Manuscript acceptance is also subject to applicable ethical publishing standards and legal requirements, including but not limited to plagiarism, copyright infringement, defamation, and duplicate publication. Each research work is allowed to be published in only one proceeding or journal and must not be submitted or published elsewhere simultaneously.